In a January 2004 editorial defending Haley Barbour’s “blind trust” in his lobbying firm, The Clarion-Ledger editorial board declared that it was hunky-dory because he no longer owned stock in the firm that had bought the firm:
In a January 2004 editorial defending Haley Barbour’s “blind trust” in his lobbying firm, The Clarion-Ledger editorial board declared that it was hunky-dory because he no longer owned stock in the firm that had bought the firm:
